[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160614142506.GA1868@techsingularity.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 15:25:07 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/27] mm, vmstat: Add infrastructure for per-node vmstats
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 12:26:13PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jun 2016, Mel Gorman wrote:
>
> > VM statistic counters for reclaim decisions are zone-based. If the kernel
> > is to reclaim on a per-node basis then we need to track per-node statistics
> > but there is no infrastructure for that. The most notable change is that
>
> There is node_page_state() so the value of any counter per node is already
> available. Note that some of the counters (NUMA_xx) for example do not
> make much sense as per zone counters and are effectively used as per node
> counters.
>
> So the main effect you are looking for is to have the counters stored in
> the per node structure as opposed to the per zone struct in order to
> avoid the summing?
Yes.
> Doing so duplicates a large amount of code it seems.
>
Also yes. I considered macro magic to cover it but it turned into a
major mess. They could always be summed so it would be a minor
performance dent and a heavier cache footprint.
> If you do this then also move over certain counters that have more of a
> per node use from per zone to per node. Like the NUMA_xxx counters.
>
As the NUMA counters are consumed by userspace, I worried that it would
break some tools. If the rest of the series gets solidified then I will
do it as a single patch on top so it can be reverted if necessary
relatively easily.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists