lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160614121006.43eec824@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Tue, 14 Jun 2016 12:10:06 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
	<intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>,
	Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the drm-intel-fixes
 tree

Hi Dave,

Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c

between commit:

  a5aac5ab876a ("drm/i915: Check VBT for port presence in addition to the strap on VLV/CHV")

from the drm-intel-fixes tree and commit:

  457c52d87e5d ("drm/i915: Only ignore eDP ports that are connected")
	(which is also in the drm-intel-fixes tree)

from the drm tree.

I fixed it up (I used the version form the drm-intel-fixes tree) and
can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next
is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may
also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ