[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160614155842.GJ30921@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 17:58:42 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] sched: Unloop sched avg decaying
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 05:28:01PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 385c947..0c0578a 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -666,17 +666,17 @@ bool sched_can_stop_tick(struct rq *rq)
> void sched_avg_update(struct rq *rq)
> {
> s64 period = sched_avg_period();
> + s64 delta;
> + u64 rem;
> + int pending;
>
> + delta = (s64)(rq_clock(rq) - rq->age_stamp);
> + if (delta <= period)
> + return;
> +
> + pending = div64_u64_rem(delta, period, &rem);
> + rq->age_stamp += delta - rem;
> + rq->rt_avg >>= pending;
> }
Blergh, and now do the profile on machine that doesn't have major
transistor count dedicated to divisions.
Why not add the division to the nohz exit path only?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists