[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jJO1v0SKt58TPjW2P8ZibW+1=iCV9pmmnM4bvj1NoQRXg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 09:39:43 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
Linux-Next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patches in the kspp and kbuild trees
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 7:13 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 15:01:42 +0200 Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz> wrote:
>>
>> I won't :). Kees, are you going to keep the patch in your tree and send
>> it to Linus once kbuild is in? Or shall I take it (which would
>> temporarily result in another duplication...).
>
> Or Kees could send you a pull request ...
My head hurts. :) How about this: since a pull request would (I think)
end up pulling the other unrelated kspp patches, how about you take
the patch into kbuild, and once it's there, I'll just remove it from
my tree (since it's on top).
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Chrome OS & Brillo Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists