[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1465926480.30123.92.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 20:48:00 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: David Cohen <david.a.cohen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] x86/platform/intel-mid: Add Power Management
Unit driver
On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 10:37 -0700, David Cohen wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:26:21AM -0700, David Cohen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > > > > > > pwr*, pwrmu*, scpmu* (as of South Complex Power Management
> > > > > > > Unit)
> > > > > > > —
> > > > > > > one of them?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 'pwr' certainly sounds good to me! PWMU perhaps?
> > > > >
> > > > > Wouldn't be a bit confusing with pwm? I would stay at 'pwr'.
^^^ (1)
> > > >
> > > > Yeah, indeed - so pwr it is?
> > >
> > > Yes. Will rename in this way, re-test and re-send.
> >
> > I'm curious about that. What pmu prefix would stand for?
>
> Nevermind :)
> I'd vote for pwmu, as it would make more sense WRT the hw
> documentation.
What about (1)?
Currently I renamed everything to pwr and it looks good.
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists