linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] x86/platform/intel-mid: Add Power Management Unit driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 14 Jun 2016 20:48:00 +0300
From:	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:	David Cohen <david.a.cohen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] x86/platform/intel-mid: Add Power Management
 Unit driver

On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 10:37 -0700, David Cohen wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:26:21AM -0700, David Cohen wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > 
> > > > > > > pwr*, pwrmu*, scpmu* (as of South Complex Power Management
> > > > > > > Unit)
> > > > > > > —
> > > > > > > one of them?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 'pwr' certainly sounds good to me! PWMU perhaps?
> > > > > 


> > > > > Wouldn't be a bit confusing with pwm? I would stay at 'pwr'.

^^^ (1)

> > > > 
> > > > Yeah, indeed - so pwr it is?
> > > 
> > > Yes. Will rename in this way, re-test and re-send.
> > 
> > I'm curious about that. What pmu prefix would stand for?
> 
> Nevermind :)
> I'd vote for pwmu, as it would make more sense WRT the hw
> documentation.

What about (1)?
Currently I renamed everything to pwr and it looks good.

-- 

Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy