lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c18e2e127e334ffeb3712f54bb1480f4@ausx13mpc124.AMER.DELL.COM>
Date:	Tue, 14 Jun 2016 17:58:02 +0000
From:	<Mario_Limonciello@...l.com>
To:	<andrew@...n.ch>
CC:	<pali.rohar@...il.com>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	<davem@...emloft.net>, <hayeswang@...ltek.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <anthony.wong@...onical.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v6] r8152: Add support for setting pass through MAC
 address on RTL8153-AD

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Lunn [mailto:andrew@...n.ch]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 12:23 PM
> To: Limonciello, Mario <Mario_Limonciello@...l.com>
> Cc: pali.rohar@...il.com; gregkh@...uxfoundation.org;
> davem@...emloft.net; hayeswang@...ltek.com; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> usb@...r.kernel.org; anthony.wong@...onical.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] r8152: Add support for setting pass through MAC
> address on RTL8153-AD
> 
> > > It is same, how to handle two network cards which tell us, that they
> > > have same MAC addresses.
> > >
> >
> > The kernel handles this just fine.  In doing this patch I checked to see
> > what it does in that scenario.  Two devices are made.  systemd doesn't
> > rename the second device via the MAC name (eg enxAABBCCDDEEFF).
> 
> What does you dhcp server do? Does it gives out the same IP address?
> You then have two interfaces on the same network, with the same MAC
> address and IP address. Then what happens?
> 
>      Andrew

I didn't test it on the same network, I used two separate networks.

I expect that the DHCP server would be awfully confused and you'd
run down an interesting problem path if it got the same MAC twice.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ