[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0j=Tv-mzdU9cyBYz-=9zfggDerSpCS+kaWBO_Z4TMX0TA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 02:21:41 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] powercap/rapl: add support for skx
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 2:06 AM, Jacob Pan
<jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 23:56:18 +0200
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
>
>> On Monday, June 13, 2016 11:32:10 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> > On Monday, May 23, 2016 09:45:42 AM Jacob Pan wrote:
>> > > SKX RAPL interface is similar to HSX/BDX.
>> > >
>> > > Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
>> > > ---
>> > > drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c | 1 +
>> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>> > >
>> > > diff --git a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c
>> > > b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c index 470bb62..a417e68 100644
>> > > --- a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c
>> > > +++ b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c
>> > > @@ -1096,6 +1096,7 @@ static const struct x86_cpu_id rapl_ids[]
>> > > __initconst = { RAPL_CPU(0x4E, rapl_defaults_core),/* Skylake */
>> > > RAPL_CPU(0x4C, rapl_defaults_cht),/* Braswell/Cherryview
>> > > */ RAPL_CPU(0x4A, rapl_defaults_tng),/* Tangier */
>> > > + RAPL_CPU(0x55, rapl_defaults_hsw_server),/* Skylake
>> > > server */ RAPL_CPU(0x56, rapl_defaults_core),/* Future Xeon */
>> > > RAPL_CPU(0x5A, rapl_defaults_ann),/* Annidale */
>> > > RAPL_CPU(0X5C, rapl_defaults_core),/* Broxton */
>> > >
>> >
>> > Can you please rebase this on top of 4.7-rc3?
>>
>> Or rather on top of the x86/cpu branch from tip?
>>
> done. just sent you v2.
> [PATCH v2] powercap/rapl: add support for denverton
Thanks for that one, but the $subject one was for SKX. Any chance to
rebase and resend this one too?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists