[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALAqxLWoXTLXcjaVv8HkNnepokMfJ7r-KDU-ORSzEhqbvtt-CA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 14:18:55 -0700
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: "linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
y2038 Mailman List <y2038@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/21] time: Add time64_to_tm()
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 10:04 PM, Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
> time_to_tm() takes time_t as an argument.
> time_t is not y2038 safe.
> Add time64_to_tm() that takes time64_t as an argument
> which is y2038 safe.
> The plan is to eventually replace all calls to time_to_tm()
> by time64_to_tm().
>
> Signed-off-by: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>
> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
This looks sane to me. Are you hoping for me to queue this, or would
you like i to go though the fsdev maintainers with my ack?
In either case.
Acked-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
thanks
-john
Powered by blists - more mailing lists