[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57607F54.6050600@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 23:04:04 +0100
From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
Jann Horn <jann@...jh.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.2 31/46] IB/security: Restrict use of the write() interface
On Tuesday 14 June 2016 10:23 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 22:11 +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
>> On Sunday 12 June 2016 10:34 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>> 3.2.81-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let
>>> me know.
>>>
>>> ------------------
>>>
>>> From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
>>>
>>> commit e6bd18f57aad1a2d1ef40e646d03ed0f2515c9e3 upstream.
>>>
>>> The drivers/infiniband stack uses write() as a replacement for
>>> bi-directional ioctl(). This is not safe. There are ways to
>>> trigger write calls that result in the return structure that
>>> is normally written to user space being shunted off to user
>>> specified kernel memory instead.
>>>
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
>>> ---
>>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/ucm.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/ucm.c
>>> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@
>>>
>>> #include <asm/uaccess.h>
>>>
>>> +#include <rdma/ib.h>
>>
>> This is breaking the build. There is no rdma/ib.h .
>
> This backported patch adds it.
>
>> The file was created by:
>> 8d36eb01da5d ("RDMA/cma: Define native IB address")
>>
>> build log is at: https://gitlab.com/sudipm/linux-next/builds/1771265
>
> It looks like your patch queue tester doesn't account for patches that
> create new files.
oops... after applying your combined diff I added them to git with
git add -u , and that doesnot take care of new files. sorry for the
noise. I should have been more careful.
But the other failure is not noise. :)
Regards
Sudip
Powered by blists - more mailing lists