[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <576086AB.3090308@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 23:35:23 +0100
From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.2 00/46] 3.2.81-rc1 review
On Tuesday 14 June 2016 11:16 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 22:56 +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
>> On Sunday 12 June 2016 10:34 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.81 release.
>>> There are 46 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses
>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Wed Jun 15 00:00:00 UTC 2016.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>
>> m32r allmodconfig build is failing.
>>
>> you will also need - 71a49d16f06d ("m32r: add definition of ioremap_wc
>> to io.h")
>>
>> build log is at: https://gitlab.com/sudipm/linux-next/builds/1771270
>
> None of these patches add a call to ioremap_wc(), and none of the
> changes since v3.2 added such a call. So I think it can wait for
> another stable cycle. Anyway, isn't it really this commit that's
> needed:
>
> commit 92a8ed4c7643809123ef0a65424569eaacc5c6b0
> Author: Sudip Mukherjee
> <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
> Date: Tue Dec 29 14:54:19 2015 -0800
>
> m32r: add io*_rep helpers
>
Looks like today is a bad day. I tested with:
92a8ed4c7643 ("m32r: add io*_rep helpers") and that gave me another
failure which needed:
71a49d16f06d ("m32r: add definition of ioremap_wc to io.h")
>
>> It doesnot apply cleanly, if you want I can send you the backported version.
>>
>> Some other builds are also failing but i dont think i can check them
>> before your deadline.
>> My other builds are at:
>> https://gitlab.com/sudipm/linux-next/pipelines/3510592
>
> As some of these failures are caused by not adding include/rdma/ib.h,
> please let me know when you have results with that fixed.
Its pending at https://gitlab.com/sudipm/linux-next/pipelines/3519324
Regards
Sudip
Powered by blists - more mailing lists