[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160615202633.GA11948@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 22:26:33 +0200
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>, Julia.Lawall@...6.fr,
Gilles.Muller@...6.fr, nicolas.palix@...g.fr,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cocci@...teme.lip6.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] scripts: add reqs python library
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 09:11:45PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
> Dne 15.6.2016 v 18:02 Luis R. Rodriguez napsal(a):
> > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 09:50:11AM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
> >> On 2016-06-15 00:10, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >>> + weight = (int(rel_specs['VERSION']) << 32) + \
> >>> + (int(rel_specs['PATCHLEVEL']) << 16) + \
> >>> + (sublevel << 8 ) + \
> >>> + (extra * 60) + (relmod * 2)
> >>
> >> This is going to silently break as soon as we have a version number with
> >> e.g. a time stamp embedded.
> >
> > Well this is adhering to a linux_version_cmp type, surely we can adjust
> > it with alternatives. It just happens that with the common stuff this
> > suffices.
> >
> > Do you have a specific string in mind I can use to test against?
>
> You can have a look at the git history of scripts/ld-version.sh.
Will use that instead. The SmPL patch can then have:
// Requires: 1.0.5
This ignores the -dirty stuff.
Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists