linux-kernel - [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/12] rcu: Make call_rcu_tasks() tolerate first call with irqs disabled

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1466027173-5501-9-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Wed, 15 Jun 2016 14:46:10 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	mingo@...nel.org, jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
	josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
	rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
	dvhart@...ux.intel.com, fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com,
	bobby.prani@...il.com,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/12] rcu: Make call_rcu_tasks() tolerate first call with irqs disabled

Currently, if the very first call to call_rcu_tasks() has irqs disabled,
it will create the rcu_tasks_kthread with irqs disabled, which will
result in a splat in the memory allocator, which kthread_run() invokes
with the expectation that irqs are enabled.

This commit fixes this problem by deferring kthread creation if called
with irqs disabled.  The first call to call_rcu_tasks() that has irqs
enabled will create the kthread.

This bug was detected by rcutorture changes that were motivated by
Iftekhar Ahmed's mutation-testing efforts.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 include/linux/rcupdate.h | 1 +
 kernel/rcu/update.c      | 7 +++++--
 kernel/sched/fair.c      | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index 9be61e47badc..a225530b2ece 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
 #include <linux/bug.h>
 #include <linux/compiler.h>
 #include <linux/ktime.h>
+#include <linux/irqflags.h>
 
 #include <asm/barrier.h>
 
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/update.c b/kernel/rcu/update.c
index 3e888cd5a594..f0d8322bc3ec 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/update.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/update.c
@@ -528,6 +528,7 @@ static int rcu_task_stall_timeout __read_mostly = HZ * 60 * 10;
 module_param(rcu_task_stall_timeout, int, 0644);
 
 static void rcu_spawn_tasks_kthread(void);
+static struct task_struct *rcu_tasks_kthread_ptr;
 
 /*
  * Post an RCU-tasks callback.  First call must be from process context
@@ -537,6 +538,7 @@ void call_rcu_tasks(struct rcu_head *rhp, rcu_callback_t func)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 	bool needwake;
+	bool havetask = READ_ONCE(rcu_tasks_kthread_ptr);
 
 	rhp->next = NULL;
 	rhp->func = func;
@@ -545,7 +547,9 @@ void call_rcu_tasks(struct rcu_head *rhp, rcu_callback_t func)
 	*rcu_tasks_cbs_tail = rhp;
 	rcu_tasks_cbs_tail = &rhp->next;
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rcu_tasks_cbs_lock, flags);
-	if (needwake) {
+	/* We can't create the thread unless interrupts are enabled. */
+	if ((needwake && havetask) ||
+	    (!havetask && !irqs_disabled_flags(flags))) {
 		rcu_spawn_tasks_kthread();
 		wake_up(&rcu_tasks_cbs_wq);
 	}
@@ -790,7 +794,6 @@ static int __noreturn rcu_tasks_kthread(void *arg)
 static void rcu_spawn_tasks_kthread(void)
 {
 	static DEFINE_MUTEX(rcu_tasks_kthread_mutex);
-	static struct task_struct *rcu_tasks_kthread_ptr;
 	struct task_struct *t;
 
 	if (READ_ONCE(rcu_tasks_kthread_ptr)) {
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 218f8e83db73..4a3b279beb42 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -2175,7 +2175,7 @@ void task_numa_free(struct task_struct *p)
 
 		grp->nr_tasks--;
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&grp->lock, flags);
-		RCU_INIT_POINTER(p->numa_group, NULL);
+		rcu_assign_pointer(p->numa_group, NULL);
 		put_numa_group(grp);
 	}
 
-- 
2.5.2