linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 10/11] cpuidle/powernv: Add support for POWER ISA v3 idle states

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <5760E035.4070103@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Wed, 15 Jun 2016 10:27:25 +0530
From:	Shreyas B Prabhu <shreyas@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
CC:	ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, mikey@...ling.org,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 10/11] cpuidle/powernv: Add support for POWER ISA v3
 idle states



On 06/14/2016 04:59 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 16:17 +0530, Shreyas B Prabhu wrote:
> 
>>
>> I ignored adding this check because this is part of initcall and we are
>> unlikely to run out of memory at this state. But I'll add the check in
>> next version.
> 
> Why do you malloc the u64 array and not the string pointer array ?
> Shouldn't you either have both on stack or both allocated ?
> 

Yes. I'll make this consistent.

Thanks,
Shreyas