[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1465974093.4219.14.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 09:01:33 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
To: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@...el.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [rfc patch] sched/fair: Use instantaneous load for fork/exec
balancing
On Wed, 2016-06-15 at 06:42 +0800, Yuyang Du wrote:
> I am entirely for giving it a "clear unadulterated reality", and even
> more for it an option.
>
> Reviewed-by: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@...el.com>
Thanks. I'll have a look at perhaps having wake_affine to the same,
such that there is a clean separation of wake/LB paths. I suppose I
should also try harder to sprinkle some 'pretty' on it, that's always
the hardest part for a master of fugly :)
-Mike
Powered by blists - more mailing lists