[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160615092051.GC24029@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 10:20:51 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
ingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, arnd@...db.de,
Waiman.Long@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/qrwlock: Let qrwlock has same layout regardless
of the endian
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 05:16:17PM +0800, Pan Xinhui wrote:
> This patch aims to get rid of endianness in queued_write_unlock(). We
> want to set __qrwlock->wmode to NULL, however the address is not
> &lock->cnts in big endian machine. That causes queued_write_unlock()
> write NULL to the wrong field of __qrwlock.
>
> Actually qrwlock can have same layout, IOW we can remove the #if
> __little_endian in struct __qrwlock. With such modification, we only
> need define some _QW* and _QR* with corresponding values in different
> endian systems.
>
> Suggested-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h | 15 +++++++++++----
> kernel/locking/qrwlock.c | 10 ++++------
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h b/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
> index 54a8e65..b135c11 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
> @@ -27,11 +27,18 @@
> /*
> * Writer states & reader shift and bias
> */
> -#define _QW_WAITING 1 /* A writer is waiting */
> -#define _QW_LOCKED 0xff /* A writer holds the lock */
> -#define _QW_WMASK 0xff /* Writer mask */
> +#ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN
> #define _QR_SHIFT 8 /* Reader count shift */
> -#define _QR_BIAS (1U << _QR_SHIFT)
> +#define _QW_SHIFF 0 /* Writer mode shift */
Well, there are other typos that could've been worse, but you probably
want to fix this...
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists