[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160615094311.GB27326@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 10:43:11 +0100
From: Chris Ryder <chris.ryder@....com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: Andrew Pinski <apinski@...ium.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
pinskia@...il.com, acme@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf annotate: ARM64 support
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:08:48AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> [adding acme and Chris]
>
> Thanks for this.
>
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 08:58:22PM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> > Add basic support to parse ARM64 assembly.
> >
> > This:
> >
> > * enables perf to correctly show the disassembly, rather than chopping
> > some constants off at the '#'. '#' is not the comment character
> > for ARM64.
> >
> > * allows perf to identify ARM64 instructions that branch to other parts
> > within the same function, thereby properly annotating them.
> >
> > * allows perf to identify function calls, allowing called functions to
> > be followed in the annotated view.
>
> It's probably worth working with Chris on this, since he was doing something
> similar for AArch32:
Actually the whole patchset was ultimately adding AArch64 support as
well.
>
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160520094407.GB26584@arm.com
>
> Chris -- did you get a chance to re-spin that series?
I haven't had chance to re-spin yet, as it's a side project of mine and not
my main job - but I might get some time to work on it this week. Very happy
to work with Andrew on this though.
Chris.
> Will
>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Pinski <apinski@...ium.com>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> > index 7e5a1e8..ea915e8 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> > @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ static int call__parse(struct ins_operands *ops)
> >
> > name++;
> >
> > -#ifdef __arm__
> > +#if defined(__arm__) || defined(__aarch64__)
> > if (strchr(name, '+'))
> > return -1;
> > #endif
> > @@ -119,9 +119,22 @@ bool ins__is_call(const struct ins *ins)
> >
> > static int jump__parse(struct ins_operands *ops)
> > {
> > - const char *s = strchr(ops->raw, '+');
> > + const char *raw = ops->raw;
> > + const char *s;
> > +#ifdef __aarch64__
> > + /* Skip over one or two commas so that cbz and tbz works. */
> > + const char *comma = strchr(raw, ',');
> > +
> > + if (comma) {
> > + raw = comma + 1;
> > + comma = strchr(raw, ',');
> > + if (comma)
> > + raw = comma + 1;
> > + }
> > +#endif
> > + s = strchr(raw, '+');
> >
> > - ops->target.addr = strtoull(ops->raw, NULL, 16);
> > + ops->target.addr = strtoull(raw, NULL, 16);
> >
> > if (s++ != NULL)
> > ops->target.offset = strtoull(s, NULL, 16);
> > @@ -134,6 +147,25 @@ static int jump__parse(struct ins_operands *ops)
> > static int jump__scnprintf(struct ins *ins, char *bf, size_t size,
> > struct ins_operands *ops)
> > {
> > +#ifdef __aarch64__
> > + const char *comma0 = strchr(ops->raw, ',');
> > +
> > + if (comma0) {
> > + const char *comma1 = strchr(comma0 + 1, ',');
> > +
> > + if (comma1)
> > + return scnprintf(bf, size,
> > + "%-6.6s %.*s, %.*s, %" PRIx64,
> > + ins->name,
> > + (int)(comma0 - ops->raw), ops->raw,
> > + (int)(comma1 - comma0 - 1), comma0 + 1,
> > + ops->target.offset);
> > +
> > + return scnprintf(bf, size, "%-6.6s %.*s, %" PRIx64, ins->name,
> > + (int)(comma0 - ops->raw), ops->raw,
> > + ops->target.offset);
> > + }
> > +#endif
> > return scnprintf(bf, size, "%-6.6s %" PRIx64, ins->name, ops->target.offset);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -253,6 +285,8 @@ static int mov__parse(struct ins_operands *ops)
> > target = ++s;
> > #ifdef __arm__
> > comment = strchr(s, ';');
> > +#elif defined(__aarch64__)
> > + comment = strstr(s, "//");
> > #else
> > comment = strchr(s, '#');
> > #endif
> > @@ -355,6 +389,29 @@ static struct ins_ops nop_ops = {
> > };
> >
> > static struct ins instructions[] = {
> > +#ifdef __aarch64__
> > + { .name = "b", .ops = &jump_ops, }, // might also be a call
> > + { .name = "b.cc", .ops = &jump_ops, },
> > + { .name = "b.cs", .ops = &jump_ops, },
> > + { .name = "b.eq", .ops = &jump_ops, },
> > + { .name = "b.ge", .ops = &jump_ops, },
> > + { .name = "b.gt", .ops = &jump_ops, },
> > + { .name = "b.hi", .ops = &jump_ops, },
> > + { .name = "b.le", .ops = &jump_ops, },
> > + { .name = "b.ls", .ops = &jump_ops, },
> > + { .name = "b.lt", .ops = &jump_ops, },
> > + { .name = "b.ne", .ops = &jump_ops, },
> > + { .name = "b.pl", .ops = &jump_ops, },
> > + { .name = "bl", .ops = &call_ops, },
> > + { .name = "cbnz", .ops = &jump_ops, },
> > + { .name = "cbz", .ops = &jump_ops, },
> > + { .name = "dec", .ops = &dec_ops, },
> > + { .name = "lock", .ops = &lock_ops, }, // fake one
> > + { .name = "mov", .ops = &mov_ops, },
> > + { .name = "nop", .ops = &nop_ops, },
> > + { .name = "tbnz", .ops = &jump_ops, },
> > + { .name = "tbz", .ops = &jump_ops, },
> > +#else
> > { .name = "add", .ops = &mov_ops, },
> > { .name = "addl", .ops = &mov_ops, },
> > { .name = "addq", .ops = &mov_ops, },
> > @@ -444,6 +501,7 @@ static struct ins instructions[] = {
> > { .name = "xadd", .ops = &mov_ops, },
> > { .name = "xbeginl", .ops = &jump_ops, },
> > { .name = "xbeginq", .ops = &jump_ops, },
> > +#endif
> > };
> >
> > static int ins__key_cmp(const void *name, const void *insp)
> > --
> > 1.9.1
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists