[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <C1C2579D7BE026428F81F41198ADB17237A8670A@irsmsx110.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 13:12:59 +0000
From: "Anaczkowski, Lukasz" <lukasz.anaczkowski@...el.com>
To: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
"mhocko@...e.com" <mhocko@...e.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Srinivasappa, Harish" <harish.srinivasappa@...el.com>,
"Odzioba, Lukasz" <lukasz.odzioba@...el.com>,
"Andrejczuk, Grzegorz" <grzegorz.andrejczuk@...el.com>,
"Daniluk, Lukasz" <lukasz.daniluk@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] Linux VM workaround for Knights Landing A/D leak
From: Nadav Amit [mailto:nadav.amit@...il.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 8:38 PM
>> + pte_t pte = ptep_get_and_clear(mm, addr, ptep);
>> +
>> + if (boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_PTE_LEAK))
>> + fix_pte_leak(mm, addr, ptep);
>> + return pte;
>> }
>
> I missed it on the previous iteration: ptep_get_and_clear already calls
> fix_pte_leak when needed. So do you need to call it again here?
You're right, Nadav. Not needing this. Will be removed in next version of the patch.
Cheers,
Lukasz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists