lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAFQd5Ds=KC26i5k1Fpe78n8S40Q+PdNpn9hp8QQLgJhgnag7A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 15 Jun 2016 23:24:21 +0900
From:	Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...gle.com>
To:	Shunqian Zheng <zhengsq@...k-chips.com>
Cc:	Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
	Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, linux@...linux.org.uk,
	姚智情 <mark.yao@...k-chips.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
	simon xue <xxm@...k-chips.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"open list:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] drm: rockchip: use common iommu api to attach iommu

Hi Shunqian,

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 9:04 PM, Shunqian Zheng <zhengsq@...k-chips.com> wrote:
> Rockchip DRM used the arm special API, arm_iommu_*(), to attach
> iommu for ARM32 SoCs. This patch convert to common iommu API
> so it would support ARM64 like RK3399.
>
> The general idea is domain_alloc(), attach_device() and
> arch_setup_dma_ops() to set dma_ops manually for DRM at the last.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shunqian Zheng <zhengsq@...k-chips.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c | 112 +++++++++++++++++-----------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.h |   1 +
>  2 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)

Please see my comment inline.

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c
> index f5a68fc..b52c38d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c
> @@ -14,16 +14,16 @@
>   * GNU General Public License for more details.
>   */
>
> -#include <asm/dma-iommu.h>
> -
>  #include <drm/drmP.h>
>  #include <drm/drm_crtc_helper.h>
>  #include <drm/drm_fb_helper.h>
> +#include <linux/dma-iommu.h>
>  #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
>  #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/of_graph.h>
>  #include <linux/component.h>
> +#include <linux/iommu.h>
>
>  #include "rockchip_drm_drv.h"
>  #include "rockchip_drm_fb.h"
> @@ -46,7 +46,8 @@ static bool is_support_iommu = true;
>  int rockchip_drm_dma_attach_device(struct drm_device *drm_dev,
>                                    struct device *dev)
>  {
> -       struct dma_iommu_mapping *mapping = drm_dev->dev->archdata.mapping;
> +       struct rockchip_drm_private *private = drm_dev->dev_private;
> +       struct iommu_domain *domain = private->domain;
>         int ret;
>
>         if (!is_support_iommu)
> @@ -58,16 +59,25 @@ int rockchip_drm_dma_attach_device(struct drm_device *drm_dev,
>
>         dma_set_max_seg_size(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
>
> -       return arm_iommu_attach_device(dev, mapping);
> +       ret = iommu_attach_device(domain, dev);
> +       if (ret) {
> +               dev_err(dev, "Failed to attach iommu device\n");
> +               return ret;
> +       }
> +
> +       /* TODO(djkurtz): fetch the mapping start/size from somewhere */
> +       arch_setup_dma_ops(dev, 0x00000000, SZ_2G, dev->bus->iommu_ops, false);
> +       return 0;
>  }
>
>  void rockchip_drm_dma_detach_device(struct drm_device *drm_dev,
>                                     struct device *dev)
>  {
> -       if (!is_support_iommu)
> -               return;
> +       struct rockchip_drm_private *private = drm_dev->dev_private;
> +       struct iommu_domain *domain = private->domain;
>
> -       arm_iommu_detach_device(dev);
> +       if (is_support_iommu)
> +               iommu_detach_device(domain, dev);
>  }
>
>  int rockchip_register_crtc_funcs(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> @@ -132,10 +142,52 @@ static void rockchip_drm_crtc_disable_vblank(struct drm_device *dev,
>                 priv->crtc_funcs[pipe]->disable_vblank(crtc);
>  }
>
> +static int rockchip_drm_init_iommu(struct drm_device *drm_dev)
> +{
> +       struct rockchip_drm_private *private = drm_dev->dev_private;
> +       struct device *dev = drm_dev->dev;
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       dev->dma_parms = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*dev->dma_parms),
> +                                     GFP_KERNEL);
> +       if (!dev->dma_parms)
> +               return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +       private->domain = iommu_domain_alloc(&platform_bus_type);
> +       if (!private->domain)
> +               return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +       /* TODO(djkurtz): fetch the mapping start/size from somewhere */
> +       ret = iommu_dma_init_domain(private->domain, 0x00000000, SZ_2G);
> +       if (ret) {
> +               dev_err(dev, "Failed to init domain\n");
> +               goto err_free_domain;
> +       }
> +
> +       ret = rockchip_drm_dma_attach_device(drm_dev, dev);
> +       if (ret) {
> +               dev_err(dev, "Failed to attach device\n");
> +               goto err_free_domain;
> +       }
> +
> +       return 0;
> +
> +err_free_domain:
> +       iommu_domain_free(private->domain);
> +
> +       return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void rockchip_iommu_cleanup(struct drm_device *drm_dev)
> +{
> +       struct rockchip_drm_private *private = drm_dev->dev_private;
> +

No need to call rockchip_drm_dma_detach_device() here?

> +       iommu_domain_free(private->domain);
> +}

Otherwise looks good, so after addressing the above, feel free to add
my Reviewed-by.

Best regards,
Tomasz

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ