linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] Kbuild: don't add obj tree in additional includes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 15 Jun 2016 17:42:07 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc:	kbuild-all@...org, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>,
	linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Kbuild: don't add obj tree in additional includes

On Tuesday, June 14, 2016 6:42:16 AM CEST kbuild test robot wrote:
>    kernel/time/Kconfig:155:warning: range is invalid
>    In file included from arch/x86/include/asm/seccomp.h:4:0,
>                     from include/linux/seccomp.h:11,
>                     from include/linux/sched.h:43,
>                     from arch/x86/um/shared/sysdep/kernel-offsets.h:2,
>                     from arch/um/kernel/asm-offsets.c:1:
> >> arch/x86/include/asm/unistd.h:15:29: fatal error: asm/unistd_32.h: No such file or directory
>     #  include <asm/unistd_32.h>

Clearly this version was no good, I'm following up with a (longer) replacement,
let's see how that works out.

	Arnd