| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20160615154913.GC3923@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 08:49:13 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
Cc: josh@...htriplett.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, jiangshanlai@...il.com,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: Fix soft lockup for rcu_nocb_kthread
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 03:27:36PM +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:
> I met this problem when using the Testgine to send package to ixgbevf nic
> by this steps:
> 1. Connect to ixgbevf, and set the speed to 10Gb/s, it could work fine.
> 2. Then use ifconfig to down the nic and up again, loop for several times.
> 3. The system panic by soft lockup.
Good catch, queued for review and testing. But what .config was your
kernel built with?
Also, I did tweak both the commit log and the patch. Your cond_resched()
would prevent soft lockups, but not RCU stalls, so I substituted
cond_resched_rcu_qs(). Please let me know if either of those changes
causes problems at your end.
Thanx, Paul
------------------------------------------------------------------------
commit c317cf19b34c0d2787b787c38bd2c8fe433215da
Author: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
Date: Wed Jun 15 15:27:36 2016 +0800
rcu: Fix soft lockup for rcu_nocb_kthread
Carrying out the following steps results in a softlockup in the
RCU callback-offload (rcuo) kthreads:
1. Connect to ixgbevf, and set the speed to 10Gb/s.
2. Use ifconfig to bring the nic up and down repeatedly.
[ 317.005148] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth2: link becomes ready
[ 368.106005] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 22s! [rcuos/1:15]
[ 368.106005] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
[ 368.106005] task: ffff88057dd8a220 ti: ffff88057dd9c000 task.ti: ffff88057dd9c000
[ 368.106005] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81579e04>] [<ffffffff81579e04>] fib_table_lookup+0x14/0x390
[ 368.106005] RSP: 0018:ffff88061fc83ce8 EFLAGS: 00000286
[ 368.106005] RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 00000000020155c0 RCX: 0000000000000001
[ 368.106005] RDX: ffff88061fc83d50 RSI: ffff88061fc83d70 RDI: ffff880036d11a00
[ 368.106005] RBP: ffff88061fc83d08 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
[ 368.106005] R10: ffff880036d11a00 R11: ffffffff819e0900 R12: ffff88061fc83c58
[ 368.106005] R13: ffffffff816154dd R14: ffff88061fc83d08 R15: 00000000020155c0
[ 368.106005] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88061fc80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 368.106005] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 368.106005] CR2: 00007f8c2aee9c40 CR3: 000000057b222000 CR4: 00000000000407e0
[ 368.106005] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[ 368.106005] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[ 368.106005] Stack:
[ 368.106005] 00000000010000c0 ffff88057b766000 ffff8802e380b000 ffff88057af03e00
[ 368.106005] ffff88061fc83dc0 ffffffff815349a6 ffff88061fc83d40 ffffffff814ee146
[ 368.106005] ffff8802e380af00 00000000e380af00 ffffffff819e0900 020155c0010000c0
[ 368.106005] Call Trace:
[ 368.106005] <IRQ>
[ 368.106005]
[ 368.106005] [<ffffffff815349a6>] ip_route_input_noref+0x516/0xbd0
[ 368.106005] [<ffffffff814ee146>] ? skb_release_data+0xd6/0x110
[ 368.106005] [<ffffffff814ee20a>] ? kfree_skb+0x3a/0xa0
[ 368.106005] [<ffffffff8153698f>] ip_rcv_finish+0x29f/0x350
[ 368.106005] [<ffffffff81537034>] ip_rcv+0x234/0x380
[ 368.106005] [<ffffffff814fd656>] __netif_receive_skb_core+0x676/0x870
[ 368.106005] [<ffffffff814fd868>] __netif_receive_skb+0x18/0x60
[ 368.106005] [<ffffffff814fe4de>] process_backlog+0xae/0x180
[ 368.106005] [<ffffffff814fdcb2>] net_rx_action+0x152/0x240
[ 368.106005] [<ffffffff81077b3f>] __do_softirq+0xef/0x280
[ 368.106005] [<ffffffff8161619c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30
[ 368.106005] <EOI>
[ 368.106005]
[ 368.106005] [<ffffffff81015d95>] do_softirq+0x65/0xa0
[ 368.106005] [<ffffffff81077174>] local_bh_enable+0x94/0xa0
[ 368.106005] [<ffffffff81114922>] rcu_nocb_kthread+0x232/0x370
[ 368.106005] [<ffffffff81098250>] ? wake_up_bit+0x30/0x30
[ 368.106005] [<ffffffff811146f0>] ? rcu_start_gp+0x40/0x40
[ 368.106005] [<ffffffff8109728f>] kthread+0xcf/0xe0
[ 368.106005] [<ffffffff810971c0>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x140/0x140
[ 368.106005] [<ffffffff816147d8>] ret_from_fork+0x58/0x90
[ 368.106005] [<ffffffff810971c0>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x140/0x140
==================================cut here==============================
It turns out that the rcuos callback-offload kthread is busy processing
a very large quantity of RCU callbacks, and it is not reliquishing the
CPU while doing so. This commit therefore adds an cond_resched_rcu_qs()
within the loop to allow other tasks to run.
Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
[ paulmck: Substituted cond_resched_rcu_qs for cond_resched. ]
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index 0082fce402a0..85c5a883c6e3 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -2173,6 +2173,7 @@ static int rcu_nocb_kthread(void *arg)
cl++;
c++;
local_bh_enable();
+ cond_resched_rcu_qs();
list = next;
}
trace_rcu_batch_end(rdp->rsp->name, c, !!list, 0, 0, 1);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists