[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160615174055.GS30921@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 19:40:55 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@....com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Scott J Norton <scott.norton@....com>,
Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v2 4/6] locking/rwsem: move down
rwsem_down_read_failed function
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 06:48:07PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> Move the rwsem_down_read_failed() function down to below the optimistic
> spinning section before enabling optimistic spinning for the readers.
newline
> There is no change in code.
Changelog fails to explain the why part.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists