[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJvTdK=pqSGw6atZn-giqxg4nd-DLTdf_wEhiC3VWGtDYLnUjg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 13:42:41 -0400
From: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86: Move away from /dev/cpu/*/msr
> Well, since the utility is part of tools/, it goes with the kernel
> version. Just like perf.
>
> Or are you dying to be able to use new tool on old kernels?
Yes. Enterprise customers use old kernels. They need
at least a snapshot of the utility that works w/o the API update.
--
Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center
Powered by blists - more mailing lists