[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5761AAA9.1080406@hpe.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 15:21:13 -0400
From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@....com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<x86@...nel.org>, <linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Scott J Norton <scott.norton@....com>,
Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v2 4/6] locking/rwsem: move down rwsem_down_read_failed
function
On 06/15/2016 01:40 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 06:48:07PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>> Move the rwsem_down_read_failed() function down to below the optimistic
>> spinning section before enabling optimistic spinning for the readers.
> newline
>
>> There is no change in code.
> Changelog fails to explain the why part.
Thanks for pointing this out. I will update the changelog to mention
that the movement is needed because it is going to call
rwsem_optimistic_spin() in later patch.
Cheers,
Longman
Powered by blists - more mailing lists