[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5761AE13.9040107@hpe.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 15:35:47 -0400
From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@....com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<x86@...nel.org>, <linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Scott J Norton <scott.norton@....com>,
Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v2 5/6] locking/rwsem: Change RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS
for better disambiguation
On 06/15/2016 01:45 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 06:48:08PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>> +++ b/arch/alpha/include/asm/rwsem.h
>> @@ -17,9 +17,9 @@
>> #define RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE 0x0000000000000000L
>> #define RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS 0x0000000000000001L
>> #define RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK 0x00000000ffffffffL
>> -#define RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS (-0x0000000100000000L)
>> +#define RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS 0xc000000000000000L
>> #define RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS
>> -#define RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS (RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS + RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS)
>> +#define RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS (-RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK)
>> +++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/rwsem.h
>> @@ -30,9 +30,9 @@
>> #define RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE __IA64_UL_CONST(0x0000000000000000)
>> #define RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS (1L)
>> #define RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK (0xffffffffL)
>> -#define RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS (-0x100000000L)
>> +#define RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS (-(1L<< 62))
>> #define RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS
>> -#define RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS (RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS + RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS)
>> +#define RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS (-RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK)
>> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/rwsem.h
>> @@ -42,9 +42,9 @@
>> #define RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE 0x0000000000000000L
>> #define RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS 0x0000000000000001L
>> #define RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK 0x00000000ffffffffL
>> -#define RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS (-0x0000000100000000L)
>> +#define RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS 0xc000000000000000L
>> #define RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS
>> -#define RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS (RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS + RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS)
>> +#define RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS (-RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK)
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h
>> @@ -41,21 +41,23 @@
>>
>> /*
>> * The bias values and the counter type limits the number of
>> - * potential readers/writers to 32767 for 32 bits and 2147483647
>> - * for 64 bits.
>> + * potential writers to 16383 for 32 bits and 1073741823 for 64 bits.
>> + * The combined readers and writers can go up to 65534 for 32-bits and
>> + * 4294967294 for 64-bits.
>> */
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>> # define RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK 0xffffffffL
>> +# define RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS (-(1L<< 62))
>> #else
>> # define RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK 0x0000ffffL
>> +# define RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS (-(1L<< 30))
>> #endif
>>
>> #define RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE 0x00000000L
>> #define RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS 0x00000001L
>> -#define RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS (-RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK-1)
>> #define RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS
>> -#define RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS (RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS + RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS)
>> +#define RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS (-RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK)
>> +++ b/include/asm-generic/rwsem.h
>> @@ -18,15 +18,16 @@
>> */
>> #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
>> # define RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK 0xffffffffL
>> +# define RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS (-(1L<< 62))
>> #else
>> # define RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK 0x0000ffffL
>> +# define RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS (-(1L<< 30))
>> #endif
>>
>> #define RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE 0x00000000L
>> #define RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS 0x00000001L
>> -#define RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS (-RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK-1)
>> #define RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS
>> -#define RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS (RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS + RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS)
>> +#define RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS (-RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK)
> Can't we collapse all that? They all seem very similar.
Yes, they are actually the same. I think we could extract the macro
definitions into asm-generic/rwsem-macros.h, for instance, and make the
architecture specific header file include the new generic header.
Cheers,
Longman
Powered by blists - more mailing lists