[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160615201213.GC7637@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 16:12:13 -0400
From: Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"axboe@...com" <axboe@...com>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/13] irq: Introduce IRQD_AFFINITY_MANAGED flag
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 04:06:55PM -0400, Keith Busch wrote:
> >
> > 0: A0 B0
> > 1: A1 B1
> > 2: A2 B2
> > 3: A3 B3
> > 4: A4 B4
> > 5: A5 B5
> > 6: A6 B6
> > 7: A7 B7
> > 8: (none)
> > ...
> > 31: (none)
>
> I'll need to look at the follow on patches do to confirm, but that's
> not what this should do. All CPU's should have a vector assigned because
> every CPU needs to be assigned a submission context using a vector. In
> your example, every vector's affinity mask should be assigned to 4 CPUs:
> vector '8' starts over with A0 B0, '9' gets A1 B1, and so on.
^^^^^^
Sorry, I meant "CPU '8'", not "vector '8'".
Powered by blists - more mailing lists