[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160616060942.GA1403@tetsubishi>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 08:09:42 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Corey Minyard <minyard@....org>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Andrew Duggan <aduggan@...aptics.com>,
Christopher Heiny <cheiny@...aptics.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/4] i2c: i801: add support of Host Notify
> > - removed the .resume hook as upstream changed suspend/resume hooks and there
> > is no need in the end to re-enable host notify on resume (tested on Lenovo
> > t440 and t450).
>
> Actually, this hook seemed to be required on the Lenovo T440 (Haswell)
> but not on the T450 (Broadwell) laptop I have now here.
>
> Wolfram, I can resend the whole series or a follow-up patch to re-enable
> after resume Host Notify. How do you prefer I deal with that?
That depends a little how we want to handle patch 4. I am going to apply
patches 1+2 today to my tree. Then you can just resend patch 3 which I
hope will get some review soon, but I will pick it up for 4.8 later
nonetheless. If it is not causing too much dependency hassle, I'd prefer
that patch 4 goes via Dmitry's input tree.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists