[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160616063912.GB9533@krava>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 08:39:12 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: He Kuang <hekuang@...wei.com>
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, wangnan0@...wei.com,
adrian.hunter@...el.com, ak@...ux.intel.com,
maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, bp@...e.de, dsahern@...il.com,
linux@...izon.com, namhyung@...nel.org, linux@...musvillemoes.dk,
yury.norov@...il.com, mpe@...erman.id.au,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tools include: Fix wrong macro definitions for
cpu_to_le* for big endian
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 01:32:09AM +0000, He Kuang wrote:
> From: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
>
> The cpu_to_le* macros in kernel.h are defined without considering
> endianese. This patch includes "byteoder/generic.h" instead to fix the
> bug, and removes redundant le64_to_cpu definition in intel-bts.c.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: He Kuang <hekuang@...wei.com>
> ---
> tools/include/linux/kernel.h | 5 ++---
> tools/perf/util/intel-bts.c | 5 -----
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/include/linux/kernel.h b/tools/include/linux/kernel.h
> index 76df535..6145e41 100644
> --- a/tools/include/linux/kernel.h
> +++ b/tools/include/linux/kernel.h
> @@ -64,11 +64,10 @@
> #endif
>
> /*
> - * Both need more care to handle endianness
> + * Need more care to handle endianness
> * (Don't use bitmap_copy_le() for now)
what's the purpose of this comment now?
> */
> -#define cpu_to_le64(x) (x)
> -#define cpu_to_le32(x) (x)
> +#include <linux/byteorder/generic.h>
>
> static inline int
> vscnprintf(char *buf, size_t size, const char *fmt, va_list args)
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/intel-bts.c b/tools/perf/util/intel-bts.c
> index 9df9960..0e632c4 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/intel-bts.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/intel-bts.c
> @@ -40,11 +40,6 @@
> #define INTEL_BTS_ERR_NOINSN 5
> #define INTEL_BTS_ERR_LOST 9
>
> -#if __BYTE_ORDER == __BIG_ENDIAN
> -#define le64_to_cpu bswap_64
> -#else
> -#define le64_to_cpu
> -#endif
the purpose of this patchset is to unify these macros right?
there're more conversion defines in:
util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-pkt-decoder.c,
please remove them as well
thanks,
jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists