[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d368370a-1601-e127-4f61-458e6839fa28@sandisk.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 11:08:48 +0200
From: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, <axboe@...com>
CC: <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/13] irq: Introduce IRQD_AFFINITY_MANAGED flag
On 06/14/2016 09:58 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/irq.h b/include/linux/irq.h
> index 4d758a7..49d66d1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/irq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/irq.h
> @@ -197,6 +197,7 @@ struct irq_data {
> * IRQD_IRQ_INPROGRESS - In progress state of the interrupt
> * IRQD_WAKEUP_ARMED - Wakeup mode armed
> * IRQD_FORWARDED_TO_VCPU - The interrupt is forwarded to a VCPU
> + * IRQD_AFFINITY_MANAGED - Affinity is managed automatically
> */
Does "managed automatically" mean managed by software? If so, I think it
would help to mention which software manages IRQ affinity if the
IRQD_AFFINITY_MANAGED flag has been set.
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists