linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] net-next: mediatek: IRQ cleanups, fixes and grouping

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 16 Jun 2016 11:44:44 +0200
From:	John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
	keyhaede@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nbd@....name
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] net-next: mediatek: IRQ cleanups, fixes and grouping



On 16/06/2016 07:20, David Miller wrote:
> From: John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>
> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 16:58:46 +0200
> 
>> This series contains 2 small code cleanups that are leftovers from the
>> MIPS support. There is also a small fix that adds proper locking to the
>> code accessing the IRQ registers. Without this fix we saw deadlocks caused
>> by the last patch of the series, which adds IRQ grouping. The grouping
>> feature allows us to use different IRQs for TX and RX. By doing so we can
>> use affinity to let the SoC handle the IRQs on different cores.
> 
> This patch series doesn't apply cleanly to the net-next tree, I get rejects
> on patch #4.
> 

it depends on the series with the 11 fixes that i sent last week which
is however in the net tree and not the next tree (i also still had the
DQL hack in my tree). if i resend this at the start of the next rc1
would you merge it into the net tree so that it becomes part of v4.8 ?

	John