[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160616015759.GP8105@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 09:57:59 +0800
From: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@...el.com>
To: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: umgwanakikbuti@...il.com, bsegall@...gle.com, pjt@...gle.com,
morten.rasmussen@....com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, matt@...eblueprint.co.uk
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 11/11] sched/fair: Refactor select_task_rq_fair()
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 09:49:35AM +0800, Yuyang Du wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index f15461f..1ab41b8 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -4986,12 +4986,14 @@ static void record_wakee(struct task_struct *p)
> */
> if (time_after(jiffies, current->wakee_flip_decay_ts + HZ)) {
> current->wakee_flips >>= 1;
> + current->wakee_count >>= 1;
> current->wakee_flip_decay_ts = jiffies;
> }
>
> if (current->last_wakee != p) {
> current->last_wakee = p;
> current->wakee_flips++;
> }
So sorry that:
current->wakee_count++;
should be moved out of the if statement.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists