[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+icZUU=tsXnjo3_Rsg1NmXh1+Mg8AML6GfGcWAYszGrgxv5Ag@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 13:51:40 +0200
From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: Ashish Sangwan <ashishsangwan2@...il.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] FUSE: Improve aio directIO write performance for size
extending writes.
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Ashish Sangwan <ashishsangwan2@...il.com> wrote:
>> While sending the blocking directIO in fuse, the write request is broken
>> into sub-requests, each of default size 128k and all the requests are sent
>> in non-blocking background mode if async_dio mode is supported by libfuse.
>> The process which issue the write wait for the completion of all the
>> sub-requests. Sending multiple requests parallely gives a chance to perform
>> parallel writes in the user space fuse implementation if it is
>> multi-threaded and hence improves the performance.
>>
>> When there is a size extending aio dio write, we switch to
>> blocking mode so that we can properly update the size of the file after
>> completion of the writes. However, in this situation all the sub-requests
>> are sent in serialized manner where the next request is sent only after
>> receiving the reply of the current request. Hence the multi-threaded user
>> space implementation is not utilized properly.
>>
>> This patch changes the size extending aio dio behavior to exactly follow
>> blocking dio. For multi threaded fuse implementation having 10 threads and
>> using buffer size of 64MB to perform async directIO, we are getting double
>> the speed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ashish Sangwan <ashishsangwan2@...il.com>
>
> Thanks for you patience. Pushed to
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mszeredi/fuse.git for-next
>
> I simplified the logic, please verify that I didn't mess something up.
>
Hi,
I would like to test fuse-next on Ubuntu/precise aka 12.04-LTS AMD64.
Do I need a modern version of libfuse?
Libfuse v2.8.6 is installed here.
Thanks.
Regards,
- Sedat -
[1] http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=libfuse
Powered by blists - more mailing lists