| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20160616115648.GB4688@pd.tnic>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 13:56:48 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
x86@...nel.org, Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com"
<kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/13] x86/dumpstack: When dumping stack bytes due to
OOPS, start with regs->sp
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 05:28:31PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> The comment suggests that show_stack(NULL, NULL) should backtrace
> the current context, but the code doesn't match the comment. If
> regs are given, start the "Stack:" hexdump at regs->sp.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Very nice:
[ 0.020008] unchecked MSR access error: RDMSR from 0x1b0 at rIP: 0xffffffff8102849f (init_intel_energy_perf.part.3+0xf/0xd0)
[ 0.024003] 0000000000000000 ffffffff81c03f10 ffffffff81028a2f 0000000000000000
[ 0.028799] ffffffff81cad5e0 ffffffff81d5e920 ffffffff81c03f38 ffffffff810271f5
[ 0.034887] ffffffffffffffff ffff88007efd18c0 ffffffff81d5e920 ffffffff81c03f48
[ 0.038883] Call Trace:
[ 0.040009] [<ffffffff81028a2f>] init_intel+0xdf/0x2b0
[ 0.042055] [<ffffffff810271f5>] identify_cpu+0x2f5/0x4f0
[ 0.044005] [<ffffffff81cdc198>] identify_boot_cpu+0x10/0x7a
[ 0.045577] [<ffffffff81cdc236>] check_bugs+0x9/0x2d
[ 0.047033] [<ffffffff81cd1ece>] start_kernel+0x3bd/0x3d9
[ 0.048005] [<ffffffff81cd1294>] x86_64_start_reservations+0x2f/0x31
[ 0.049668] [<ffffffff81cd13fe>] x86_64_start_kernel+0x168/0x176
That's exactly what I wanted to see! Thanks for the hints.
Here's what I did:
---
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kdebug.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kdebug.h
index e5f5dc9787d5..1ef9d581b5d9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kdebug.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kdebug.h
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ extern void die(const char *, struct pt_regs *,long);
extern int __must_check __die(const char *, struct pt_regs *, long);
extern void show_trace(struct task_struct *t, struct pt_regs *regs,
unsigned long *sp, unsigned long bp);
+extern void show_stack_regs(struct pt_regs *regs);
extern void __show_regs(struct pt_regs *regs, int all);
extern unsigned long oops_begin(void);
extern void oops_end(unsigned long, struct pt_regs *, int signr);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
index 400a2e17c1d1..0c3436535b4a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
@@ -206,6 +206,11 @@ void show_stack(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *sp)
show_stack_log_lvl(task, NULL, sp, bp, "");
}
+void show_stack_regs(struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ show_stack_log_lvl(current, regs, (unsigned long *)regs->sp, regs->bp, "");
+}
+
static arch_spinlock_t die_lock = __ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
static int die_owner = -1;
static unsigned int die_nest_count;
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/extable.c b/arch/x86/mm/extable.c
index 4bb53b89f3c5..fafc771568c7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/extable.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/extable.c
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
#include <asm/traps.h>
+#include <asm/kdebug.h>
typedef bool (*ex_handler_t)(const struct exception_table_entry *,
struct pt_regs *, int);
@@ -46,8 +47,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(ex_handler_ext);
bool ex_handler_rdmsr_unsafe(const struct exception_table_entry *fixup,
struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr)
{
- WARN_ONCE(1, "unchecked MSR access error: RDMSR from 0x%x\n",
- (unsigned int)regs->cx);
+ if (pr_warn_once("unchecked MSR access error: RDMSR from 0x%x at rIP: 0x%lx (%pF)\n",
+ (unsigned int)regs->cx, regs->ip, (void *)regs->ip))
+ show_stack_regs(regs);
/* Pretend that the read succeeded and returned 0. */
regs->ip = ex_fixup_addr(fixup);
@@ -60,9 +62,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(ex_handler_rdmsr_unsafe);
bool ex_handler_wrmsr_unsafe(const struct exception_table_entry *fixup,
struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr)
{
- WARN_ONCE(1, "unchecked MSR access error: WRMSR to 0x%x (tried to write 0x%08x%08x)\n",
- (unsigned int)regs->cx,
- (unsigned int)regs->dx, (unsigned int)regs->ax);
+ if (pr_warn_once("unchecked MSR access error: WRMSR to 0x%x (tried to write 0x%08x%08x) at rIP: 0x%lx (%pF)\n",
+ (unsigned int)regs->cx, (unsigned int)regs->dx,
+ (unsigned int)regs->ax, regs->ip, (void *)regs->ip))
+ show_stack_regs(regs);
/* Pretend that the write succeeded. */
regs->ip = ex_fixup_addr(fixup);
diff --git a/include/linux/printk.h b/include/linux/printk.h
index f4da695fd615..0a961657e2a0 100644
--- a/include/linux/printk.h
+++ b/include/linux/printk.h
@@ -309,20 +309,25 @@ extern asmlinkage void dump_stack(void) __cold;
#define printk_once(fmt, ...) \
({ \
static bool __print_once __read_mostly; \
+ int __ret_print_once = !__print_once; \
\
if (!__print_once) { \
__print_once = true; \
printk(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
} \
+ __ret_print_once; \
})
+
#define printk_deferred_once(fmt, ...) \
({ \
static bool __print_once __read_mostly; \
+ int __ret_print_once = !__print_once; \
\
if (!__print_once) { \
__print_once = true; \
printk_deferred(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
} \
+ __ret_print_once; \
})
#else
#define printk_once(fmt, ...) \
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists