[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5762027C.2020507@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 09:35:56 +0800
From: Hekuang <hekuang@...wei.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Yury Norov <ynorov@...iumnetworks.com>
CC: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"Adrian Hunter" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
George Spelvin <linux@...izon.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>,
Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/perf: fix the word selected in find_*_bit
在 2016/6/16 5:29, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 写道:
> Em Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 12:11:04AM +0300, Yury Norov escreveu:
>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:51:27PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
>>> Maybe there already is some macro doing the conversion for you...
>> yes it is, cpu_to_le64() is what you want
> Beware that the cpu_to_le64() in tools/perf is bogus, we need to grab a
> copy from the kernel sources.
>
> - Arnaldo
>
[PATCH 1/2] tools include: Sync byteorder/generic.h
[PATCH 2/2] tools include: Fix wrong macro definitions for cpu_to_le*
for big endian
Here're two patches related to this issue, sorry for wrongly sent two more
reduntant mails.
Thank you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists