lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5762A010.2070201@linaro.org>
Date:	Thu, 16 Jun 2016 15:48:16 +0300
From:	Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org>
To:	Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
	Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@...com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/15] drivers: net: cpsw: ethtool: fix accessing to
 suspended device



On 15.06.16 19:45, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> On 06/15/2016 07:14 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> On 06/15/2016 04:55 AM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>>> The CPSW might be suspended by RPM if all ethX interfaces are down,
>>> but it still could be accesible through ethtool interfce. In this case
>>> ethtool operations, requiring registers access, will cause L3 errors and
>>> CPSW crash.
>>>
>>> Hence, fix it by adding RPM get/put calls in ethtool callbcaks which
>>> can access CPSW registers: .set_coalesce(), .get_ethtool_stats(),
>>> .set_pauseparam(), .get_regs()
>>
>> Provided that you implement an ethtool_ops::begin, it will be called
>> before each ethtool operation runs, so that could allow you to eliminate
>> some of the duplication here. Conversely ethtool_ops::end terminates
>> each operation and can be used for that purpose.
>
> Ah. Thanks for the advice. (assume you've meant .complete())

Maybe better leave as is, I'm going to add two additional ehttool ops
containing RPM sensitive part and not, better to split code on those,
if possible...and hiding put/get in begin op can call rpm when it's not
needed at all..

>
>
>

-- 
Regards,
Ivan Khoronzhuk

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ