[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5762A8FD.7070807@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 14:26:21 +0100
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: "Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" <tixy@...aro.org>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] firmware: scpi: add device power domain support
On 16/06/16 14:14, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-06-16 at 11:37 +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> This series add support for SCPI based device device power state
>> management using genpd.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Sudeep
>>
>> v1[1]->v2:
>> - Fixed the endianness handling in scpi_device_get_power_state
>> as spotted by Tixy
>> - Renamed scpi_pd.c to scpi_pm_domain.c as suggested by Ulf
>
> You seemed to also have made some changes to the contents of the file,
> is that deliberate? This is the diff...
>
name array was accidental. I added it as I was not sure if I want to
make it dynamic, just found I might be hitting the max while testing and
added it.
The other change was something that I found recently after I tried to
get rid of juno coresight primecell override after I realized AMBA
framework should be able to cope up with power domains. I will reply
on that thread. Sorry for missing out this in changelog. I assume in my
previous testings only the paths that ignored the return were executed.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists