lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5762CF88.4060800@metafoo.de>
Date:	Thu, 16 Jun 2016 18:10:48 +0200
From:	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
To:	Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...sung.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andi Shyti <andi@...zian.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: add spi_sync_single_transfer wrapper for single
 spi_transfer

On 06/16/2016 01:40 AM, Andi Shyti wrote:
> The spi_sync_single_transfer function calls spi_sync_transfer
> with a single spi_transfer element, instead of an array.

So, what's the advantage of using this as opposed to calling
spi_sync_transfer with a 1 for the number of transfers?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ