linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] firmware: scpi: add device power domain support using genpd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 16 Jun 2016 18:59:13 +0100
From:	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:	"Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" <tixy@...aro.org>
Cc:	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
	Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] firmware: scpi: add device power domain support
 using genpd



On 16/06/16 18:47, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-06-16 at 11:38 +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> [...]
>> +enum scpi_power_domain_state {
>> +	SCPI_PD_STATE_ON = 0,
>> +	SCPI_PD_STATE_OFF = 3,
>> +};
>
> The SCPI doc defines the meaning of these numbers (0 and 3) in the 'Juno
> specifics' chapter. So does these values need to come from device-tree
> to allow for other hardware or SCP implementations?
>

Ah unfortunately true :(. I had not noticed that. But I would like to
check if this can be made as part of the standard protocol. Adding such
details to DT seems overkill and defeat of the whole purpose of the
standard protocol.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep