[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160616181912.GQ6836@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 20:19:12 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: "Odzioba, Lukasz" <lukasz.odzioba@...el.com>
Cc: "Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
"aarcange@...hat.com" <aarcange@...hat.com>,
"vdavydov@...allels.com" <vdavydov@...allels.com>,
"mingli199x@...com" <mingli199x@...com>,
"minchan@...nel.org" <minchan@...nel.org>,
"Anaczkowski, Lukasz" <lukasz.anaczkowski@...el.com>,
"Shutemov, Kirill" <kirill.shutemov@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm/swap.c: flush lru_add pvecs on compound page
arrival
On Thu 16-06-16 18:08:57, Odzioba, Lukasz wrote:
> On Thru 09-06-16 02:22 PM Michal Hocko wrote:
> > I agree it would be better to do the same for others as well. Even if
> > this is not an immediate problem for those.
>
> I am not able to find clear reasons why we shouldn't do it for the rest.
> Ok so what do we do now? I'll send v2 with proposed changes.
> Then do we still want to have stats on those pvecs?
> In my opinion it's not worth it now.
I think the fix has a higher priority - we also want to backport it to
stable trees IMO. We can discuss the stats and how to present them
later.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists