[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F3A13F30B@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 21:39:00 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
CC: "y2038@...ts.linaro.org" <y2038@...ts.linaro.org>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
"linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] ia64: efi: use timespec64 for persistent clock
> Aside from this, we get a little closer to removing the
> __weak read_persistent_clock() definition, which relies on
> converting all architectures to provide read_persistent_clock64
> instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Applied. Thanks
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists