[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160617230431.GG14480@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2016 00:04:31 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [off-list] a path toward killing thread_info
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 03:41:49PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> PeterZ, I'm thinking of adding task_ti_flags_ptr to directly find the
> ti flags word given a task_struct * so the scheduler can use it. Does
> that seem reasonable to you?
What are you trying to do? Merge task_struct and thread_info?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists