[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160617072848.GC810@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:28:48 +0900
From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
John Einar Reitan <john.reitan@...s.arm.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
Rafael Aquini <aquini@...hat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@...fitbricks.com>,
Chan Gyun Jeong <chan.jeong@....com>,
Sangseok Lee <sangseok.lee@....com>,
Kyeongdon Kim <kyeongdon.kim@....com>,
Chulmin Kim <cmlaika.kim@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/12] Support non-lru page migration
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 07:09:32PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 05:42:11PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > On (06/16/16 15:47), Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > > [..]
> > > > > > this is what I'm getting with the [zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
> > > > > > applied: "count:0 mapcount:-127". which may be not related to zsmalloc at this point.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > kernel: BUG: Bad page state in process khugepaged pfn:101db8
> > > > > > kernel: page:ffffea0004076e00 count:0 mapcount:-127 mapping: (null) index:0x1
> > > > >
> > > > > Hm, it seems double free.
> > > > >
> > > > > It doen't happen if you disable zram? IOW, it seems to be related
> > > > > zsmalloc migration?
> > > >
> > > > need to test more, can't confidently answer now.
> > > >
> > > > > How easy can you reprodcue it? Could you bisect it?
> > > >
> > > > it takes some (um.. random) time to trigger the bug.
> > > > I'll try to come up with more details.
> > >
> > > Could you revert [1] and retest?
> > >
> > > [1] mm/compaction: split freepages without holding the zone lock
> >
> > ok, so this is not related to zsmalloc. finally manged to reproduce
> > it. will fork a separate thread.
>
> The reason I mentioned [1] is that it seems to have a bug.
>
> isolate_freepages_block
> __isolate_free_page
> if(!zone_watermark_ok())
> return 0;
> list_add_tail(&page->lru, freelist);
>
> However, the page is not isolated.
> Joonsoo?
Good job!
I will fix it soon.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists