[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160617082559.GD30935@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 10:25:59 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Oleg Drokin <green@...uxhacker.ru>
Cc: Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, mingo@...hat.com,
arjan@...ux.intel.com, "J . Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>
Subject: Re: initialize a mutex into locked state?
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 02:23:35PM -0400, Oleg Drokin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> To my surprise I found out that it's not possible to initialise a mutex into
> a locked state.
> I discussed it with Arjan and apparently there's no fundamental reason
> not to allow this.
There is. A mutex _must_ have an owner. If you can initialize it in
locked state, you could do so statically, ie. outside of the context of
a task.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists