linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] gpio: Allow PC/104 devices on X86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 17 Jun 2016 12:47:14 +0200
From:	Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>
Cc:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, x86@...nel.org,
	"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] gpio: Allow PC/104 devices on X86_64

On 31.05.2016 17:25, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 07:23:06AM -0400, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
>> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:41:49AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 12:08 AM, William Breathitt Gray
>>> <vilhelm.gray@...il.com> wrote:
>>>> With the introduction of the ISA_BUS_API Kconfig option, ISA-style
>>>> drivers may be built for X86_64 architectures. This patch changes the
>>>> ISA Kconfig option dependency of the PC/104 drivers to ISA_BUS_API, thus
>>>> allowing them to build for X86_64 as they are expected to.
> […]
>> Greg K-H,
>>
>> Would you be able to pick up this entire patchset via driver-core; I
>> figure that tree is the most appropriate to receive any core ISA bus
>> driver changes (unless you see a more fitting path to take).
> […]
> Yes, I can take this through the driver core tree as that's where the
> original series came from...

Was this series merged or did it fell through the cracks? I currently
assume the latter, as I can't see it in neither mainline nor linux-next
(but maybe I'm missing something). Just wondering, because I have this
issue on my regression list for 4.7.

For the whole context see:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.gpio/17016/

Sincerely, your regression tracker for Linux 4.7 (http://bit.ly/28JRmJo)
 Thorsten