[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160617120703.GN1868@techsingularity.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 13:07:03 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/27] mm, page_alloc: Remove fair zone allocation policy
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 01:27:09PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 06/09/2016 08:04 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> >The fair zone allocation policy interleaves allocation requests between
> >zones to avoid an age inversion problem whereby new pages are reclaimed
> >to balance a zone. Reclaim is now node-based so this should no longer be
> >an issue and the fair zone allocation policy is not free. This patch
> >removes it.
>
> I wonder if fair zone allocation had the side effect of preventing e.g. a
> small Normal zone to be almost fully occupied by long-lived unreclaimable
> allocations early in the kernel lifetime. So that might be one thing to
> watch out for.
It's a marginal corner case and the zonelist scan is slightly inefficient
as the first zone is always skipped but the impact is light.
> But otherwise I would agree it should be no longer needed
> with node-based reclaim.
>
> >Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
>
> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
>
Thanks.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists