lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 17 Jun 2016 15:09:36 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:	Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>,
	Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: regression caused by 08f511fd41c3 ("cpufreq: Reduce
 cpufreq_update_util() overhead a bit")

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:30:23 +0800 Jisheng Zhang wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I found one regression: In an idle system, wakeups/s (reported by powertop)
>> is increased a lot, e.g on a intel snb 4 core platform, the wakeup event
>> number is increased from 8 wakeups/s to 24 wakeup/s. bisect points to
>> this commit. I could send detailed bisect log if it's wanted.
>>
>
> more information maybe useful: after the commit, the top two wakeup source
> are
>
>         Process        [rcu_sched]
>
>         Timer          tick_sched_timer

And what was there before the commit?

Granted, I'm not seeing this on my systems.

Paul, Peter, any ideas about what may be going on here?

Thanks,
Rafael

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ