[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87vb18uef2.fsf@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:34:57 +0300
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
intel-gfx <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] Bad flicker on skylake HQD due to code in the 4.7 merge window
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 03:42:12PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
>> On Thu, 2016-06-16 at 14:29 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2016-06-16 at 23:24 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> > > I guess we'll need the bisect on this one to make progress.
>> >
>> > Sigh, I was afraid that might be the next step.
>>
>> OK, I have a curious data point. I assumed the problem would be
>> somewhere in the drm update, so I started bisecting that at the top.
>> However, the top most commit:
>>
>> commit 1d6da87a3241deb13d073c4125d19ed0e5a0c62c
>> Merge: 1f40c49 a39ed68
>> Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
>> Date: Mon May 23 11:48:48 2016 -0700
>>
>> Merge branch 'drm-next' of git://people.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux
>>
>> Isn't actually bad. There's no flicker here, so whatever caused the
>> problem came from some update after this.
>
> There was a fixes pull after this. Might be worth it to restrict to just
> the i915 changes, which are just 5b4fd5b1111b1230cd037..157d2c7fad0863222
>
> Looking at those nothing seems to stick out which might explain what's
> happening for you.
This should be easy enough to try before bisecting:
http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1466162081-12042-1-git-send-email-mika.kahola@intel.com
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
Powered by blists - more mailing lists