linux-kernel - Re: regression caused by bb6ab52f2bef ("intel_pstate: Do not set utilization update hook too early")

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0jEf0rYZMqL_x8aHaNo4RwAJGqSToO4VxRL7hfsv7BEfg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 17 Jun 2016 17:40:38 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:	Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: regression caused by bb6ab52f2bef ("intel_pstate: Do not set
 utilization update hook too early")

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> First of all, sorry for top post, only webmail is available now.
>
> Second, sorry again for report incorrect commit, I were too tired this morning so I remember the wrong commit.  The regression is caused by bb6ab52f2bef ("intel_pstate: Do not set utilization update hook too early"), so I update the email title.

OK, that makes much more sense. :-)

And

4578ee7e1def intel_pstate: Avoid unnecessary synchronize_sched()
during initialization

is not sufficient I suppose?