| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1466178096-5623-8-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hpe.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 11:41:33 -0400
From: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@....com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Scott J Norton <scott.norton@....com>,
Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@....com>,
Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@....com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH-tip/locking/core v3 07/10] locking/rwsem: Change RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS for better disambiguation
When the count value is in between 0 and RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS, there
are 2 possibilities. Either a writer is present and there is no
waiter or there are waiters and readers. There is no easy way to
know which is true unless the wait_lock is taken.
This patch changes the RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS from 0xffff (32-bit) or
0xffffffff (64-bit) to 0xc0000000 (32-bit) or 0xc000000000000000
(64-bit). By doing so, we will be able to determine if writers
are present by looking at the count value alone without taking the
wait_lock.
This patch has the effect of halving the maximum number of writers
that can attempt to take the write lock simultaneously. However,
even the reduced maximum of about 16k (32-bit) or 1G (64-bit) should
be more than enough for the foreseeable future.
With that change, the following identity is now no longer true:
RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS = RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS + RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@....com>
---
arch/alpha/include/asm/rwsem.h | 3 ++-
arch/ia64/include/asm/rwsem.h | 2 +-
arch/s390/include/asm/rwsem.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h | 3 ++-
include/asm-generic/rwsem.h | 4 ++--
include/asm-generic/rwsem_types.h | 10 ++++++----
kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
7 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/alpha/include/asm/rwsem.h b/arch/alpha/include/asm/rwsem.h
index f99e39a..dc236a5 100644
--- a/arch/alpha/include/asm/rwsem.h
+++ b/arch/alpha/include/asm/rwsem.h
@@ -179,7 +179,8 @@ static inline void __downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
"2: br 1b\n"
".previous"
:"=&r" (oldcount), "=m" (sem->count), "=&r" (temp)
- :"Ir" (-RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS), "m" (sem->count) : "memory");
+ :"Ir" (-RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS + RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS),
+ "m" (sem->count) : "memory");
#endif
if (unlikely(oldcount < 0))
rwsem_downgrade_wake(sem);
diff --git a/arch/ia64/include/asm/rwsem.h b/arch/ia64/include/asm/rwsem.h
index 21a9066..ecea341 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/rwsem.h
+++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/rwsem.h
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ __downgrade_write (struct rw_semaphore *sem)
do {
old = atomic_long_read(&sem->count);
- new = old - RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS;
+ new = old - RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS + RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS;
} while (atomic_long_cmpxchg_release(&sem->count, old, new) != old);
if (old < 0)
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/rwsem.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/rwsem.h
index 13dedc8..e675a64 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/rwsem.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/rwsem.h
@@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ static inline void __downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
signed long old, new, tmp;
- tmp = -RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS;
+ tmp = -RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS + RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS;
asm volatile(
" lg %0,%2\n"
"0: lgr %1,%0\n"
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h
index c6d155e..ea36832 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h
@@ -192,7 +192,8 @@ static inline void __downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
"1:\n\t"
"# ending __downgrade_write\n"
: "+m" (sem->count)
- : "a" (sem), "er" (-RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS)
+ : "a" (sem), "er" (-RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS +
+ RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS)
: "memory", "cc");
}
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/rwsem.h b/include/asm-generic/rwsem.h
index 3cb8d98..962e75b 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/rwsem.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/rwsem.h
@@ -106,8 +106,8 @@ static inline void __downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
* read-locked region is ok to be re-ordered into the
* write side. As such, rely on RELEASE semantics.
*/
- tmp = atomic_long_add_return_release(-RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS,
- (atomic_long_t *)&sem->count);
+ tmp = atomic_long_add_return_release(-RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS +
+ RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS, (atomic_long_t *)&sem->count);
if (tmp < 0)
rwsem_downgrade_wake(sem);
}
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/rwsem_types.h b/include/asm-generic/rwsem_types.h
index 093ef6a..6d55d25 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/rwsem_types.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/rwsem_types.h
@@ -7,20 +7,22 @@
* the semaphore definition
*
* The bias values and the counter type limits the number of
- * potential readers/writers to 32767 for 32 bits and 2147483647
- * for 64 bits.
+ * potential writers to 16383 for 32 bits and 1073741823 for 64 bits.
+ * The combined readers and writers can go up to 65534 for 32-bits and
+ * 4294967294 for 64-bits.
*/
#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
# define RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK 0xffffffffL
+# define RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS (-(1L << 62))
#else
# define RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK 0x0000ffffL
+# define RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS (-(1L << 30))
#endif
#define RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE 0x00000000L
#define RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS 0x00000001L
-#define RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS (-RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK-1)
#define RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS
-#define RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS (RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS + RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS)
+#define RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS (-RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK)
#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
#endif /* _ASM_GENERIC_RWSEM_TYPES_H */
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
index 5fd689e..3330c0a 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
@@ -29,28 +29,30 @@
* 0x00000000 rwsem is unlocked, and no one is waiting for the lock or
* attempting to read lock or write lock.
*
- * 0xffff000X (1) X readers active or attempting lock, with waiters for lock
+ * 0xc000000X (1) X readers active or attempting lock, with waiters for lock
* X = #active readers + # readers attempting lock
* (X*ACTIVE_BIAS + WAITING_BIAS)
- * (2) 1 writer attempting lock, no waiters for lock
+ *
+ * 0xffff000X (1) 1 writer attempting lock, no waiters for lock
* X-1 = #active readers + #readers attempting lock
* ((X-1)*ACTIVE_BIAS + ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS)
- * (3) 1 writer active, no waiters for lock
+ * (2) 1 writer active, no waiters for lock
* X-1 = #active readers + #readers attempting lock
* ((X-1)*ACTIVE_BIAS + ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS)
*
- * 0xffff0001 (1) 1 reader active or attempting lock, waiters for lock
+ * 0xc0000001 (1) 1 reader active or attempting lock, waiters for lock
* (WAITING_BIAS + ACTIVE_BIAS)
- * (2) 1 writer active or attempting lock, no waiters for lock
+ *
+ * 0xffff0001 (1) 1 writer active or attempting lock, no waiters for lock
* (ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS)
*
- * 0xffff0000 (1) There are writers or readers queued but none active
+ * 0xc0000000 (1) There are writers or readers queued but none active
* or in the process of attempting lock.
* (WAITING_BIAS)
* Note: writer can attempt to steal lock for this count by adding
* ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS in cmpxchg and checking the old count
*
- * 0xfffe0001 (1) 1 writer active, or attempting lock. Waiters on queue.
+ * 0xbfff0001 (1) 1 writer active, or attempting lock. Waiters on queue.
* (ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS + WAITING_BIAS)
*
* Note: Readers attempt to lock by adding ACTIVE_BIAS in down_read and checking
@@ -62,9 +64,23 @@
* checking the count becomes ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS for successful lock
* acquisition (i.e. nobody else has lock or attempts lock). If
* unsuccessful, in rwsem_down_write_failed, we'll check to see if there
- * are only waiters but none active (5th case above), and attempt to
+ * are only waiters but none active (7th case above), and attempt to
* steal the lock.
*
+ * We can infer the reader/writer/waiter state of the lock by looking
+ * at the count value:
+ * (1) count > 0
+ * Only readers are present.
+ * (2) WAITING_BIAS - ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS < count < 0
+ * Have writers, maybe readers, but no waiter
+ * (3) WAITING_BIAS < count <= WAITING_BIAS - ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS
+ * Have readers and waiters, but no writer
+ * (4) count < WAITING_BIAS
+ * Have writers and waiters, maybe readers
+ *
+ * IOW, writers are present when
+ * (1) count < WAITING_BIAS, or
+ * (2) WAITING_BIAS - ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS < count < 0
*/
/*
--
1.7.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists