linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched,fair: Fix PELT integrity for new tasks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKfTPtDTxb7KqPzwZjEVQVd9x84v2By_3v2xhbPp3X4tEJ1n3w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 17 Jun 2016 18:14:54 +0200
From:	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@...el.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
	Benjamin Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
	Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
	Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched,fair: Fix PELT integrity for new tasks

On 17 June 2016 at 18:02, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 04:28:14PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 04:09:01PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Scenario 1: switch to fair class
>> > >
>> > >   p->sched_class = fair_class;
>> > >   if (queued)
>> > >     enqueue_task(p);
>> > >       ...
>> > >         enqueue_entity()
>> > >           enqueue_entity_load_avg()
>> > >             migrated = !sa->last_update_time (true)
>> > >             if (migrated)
>> > >               attach_entity_load_avg()
>> > >   check_class_changed()
>> > >     switched_from() (!fair)
>> > >     switched_to()   (fair)
>> > >       switched_to_fair()
>> > >         attach_entity_load_avg()
>>
>> > > @@ -733,18 +737,21 @@ void post_init_entity_util_avg(struct sc
>> > >                 }
>> > >                 sa->util_sum = sa->util_avg * LOAD_AVG_MAX;
>> > >         }
>> > > +
>> > > +       update_cfs_rq_load_avg(cfs_rq_clock_task(cfs_rq), cfs_rq, false);
>> > > +       attach_entity_load_avg(cfs_rq, se);
>> >
>> > A new RT task will be attached and will contribute to the load until
>> > it decays to 0
>
>> > Should we detach it for non cfs task ?
>
> Right, an attach + detach, which basically ends up being:
>
>> > We just want to update
>> > last_update_time of RT task to something different from 0
>
> this. That's the same as starting as fair and then doing
> switched_from_fair().

Yes that's also a possibility to add a way to call switched_from_fair
for non fair task

>
> So yes, ho-humm, how to go about doing that bestest. Lemme have a play.
>