linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: uniphier: fix meaningless drive control offsets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdZ+iVxW25Vsp6F8gXsKJ7crdVwZKVHFrWAt2rZ3WR+tng@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 18 Jun 2016 10:03:37 +0200
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc:	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: uniphier: fix meaningless drive control offsets

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:

> These are input-only pins.  They do not support drive controlling
> in the first place.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>

Patch applied.

Yours,
Linus Walleij